Thermal Expansion Co-effecient: Pultruded vs Roll Wrapped


Author
Message
BenH
BenH
Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2, Visits: 32
I'm looking to use a CF tube for a length critical application with absolute minimum axial thermal expansion, would pultruded or roll-wrapped be better for this application?
If there is any data regarding the thermal properties of each to compare the two types that'd be brilliant.
Replies
compositepro
compositepro
Supreme Being (242 reputation)Supreme Being (242 reputation)Supreme Being (242 reputation)Supreme Being (242 reputation)Supreme Being (242 reputation)Supreme Being (242 reputation)Supreme Being (242 reputation)Supreme Being (242 reputation)Supreme Being (242 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 22, Visits: 65
A roll wrapped tube will suffer volumetric changes depending on how it's played up

Why carbon, if this is for something length critical there are materials with lower Lte values 
Edited 12 Years Ago by compositepro
BenH
BenH
Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)Forum Member (26 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2, Visits: 32
Any recommendations? Preferably available in 8mm OD tube of 2m lengths?
Been googleing but little doing.
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Similar Topics

Reading This Topic

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search