jeffrey bres
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 42,
Visits: 469
|
+xWell now you're starting to throw in other variables that make it hard to determine what is going wrong, but in this case I would suggest you have tried to do infusion with a resin that is not suitable for infusion. Flat sheet is quite forgiving to infuse, you dont have geometry trapping air as the resin flows around it. And contrary to what you might expect, thicker layups can actually infuse easier and better than thin layups, due to the flow channels created by the fibre crimp. Thin laminates have less space for the resin to flow, so actually require a lower viscosity resin. When things aren't working, that is when you need to become scientific and repeat the experiment with as few variables as possible, changing things can throw you off finding the solution. I can understand running out of infusion resin, but waiting for more to arrive is probably a better idea than trying to infuse with hand laminating resin and binning all that carbon/glass/consumables/time. Release agent is not a concern here, parts are releasing so that is fine. Just a warning though, if you have waxed over the Easyleased moulds, you now need to treat that mould as a waxed mould, you can't put any more coats of Easylease on unless you strip it all off and start again. Wax on top of chemical release agent is ok, chemical release agent on top of wax is a disaster waiting to happen. So, these last two experiments I would say are inconclusive because of the different resin used. I feel they failed because that resin didn't wet the reinforcement out properly, leading to an extremely lean resin content that explains both the poor surface finish as well as the poor interlaminar adhesion. The previous experiment failed due to bridging. And the one before that failed due to air leaks. Solve each of these issues all in the same layup without running into any other issues, and you will get a good result. Unfortunately this is the learning curve with infusion and composites in general, and at the moment the process is teaching. Its a shame school is expensive, but keep going with it and the process will deliver. With regards to your layup and choice of reinforcements, then I would say if it works for you then it works for you and there is no reason to change that unless you want to move to pre-pregs where your choice of reinforcement is more limited to what you can buy commercially. That said, virtually what you said about needing the flexibility of the glass and the stiffness of the carbon is the misunderstanding that most people have with composites. You don't get both properties, you actually can't make a fibreglass structure stronger or stiffer by adding carbon, just like you can't make a carbon structure more flexible by adding fibreglass. Carbon fibre has an elongation to break of about 1.5%, while fibreglass has an elongation to break of about 5%. So when your laminate takes a load, it doesn't matter if you have 100 layers of carbon fibre with 1 layer of fibreglass or 100 layers of fibreglass with 1 layer of carbon or 50 layers of each, the entire laminate can still only stretch 1.5% before the carbon breaks. The fibreglass will keep wanting to stretch to 5% before it breaks, so if your laminate cops an impact or a point loading that stretches it beyond 101.5% of its total length, then all of the carbon in that laminate is going to break, while the fibreglass is going to keep going. Once the carbon is broken it isn't doing anything for the structure, so you only have the strength of the fibreglass. So to avoid your part flying to bits entirely, it would need the fibreglass to be strong enough to carry the required loads once the carbon has broken, which makes the carbon redundant; OR it would need the carbon to be strong enough that it can carry the required loads without stretching beyond 1.5%, which then makes the fibreglass redundant. A good analogy I heard for it is it's kind of like having a piece of aluminium (your carbon) and trying to reinforce it with a rubber band (your fibreglass). If you take that structure and bend it, the rubber band will bend significantly further than the aluminium but it isn't doing anything to prevent the aluminium from bending. There are situations where fibreglass is a superior material choice to carbon. If you have an application where you know a given laminate is going to be subject to loads that stretch it beyond 1.5%, then you have two options: make the laminate stronger by adding more layers so that it takes a higher load to achieve that elongation, which also means a heavier laminate. Or, use a material that can stretch further than 1.5% before it breaks, like fibreglass. I will wait with infusion till i have more infusion resin. Thats what i planned. On the side of the laminate. The prepreg is not an option for now. 3 to 4 layer is max what i can carry of 200gramms before it gets to heavy. Only glass id to flexible. And only carbon to fregile. The mix (i know you explained 3x) is the best so far to make it light and still strong and stiff enough to not explode when s*** happens. The cracked carbon isnt a problem Then we just repair it. But only carbon is to expensive and carbon cevlar is another option. In my experiance with these boats. The carbon in the center is strongest. Most stiff and hanfles the most impact. The carbon on the outside is 100% cosmetic. But yes. I will go back. (I know easy over wax isnt gonna work. ) I did total of 12 coats easy. And only wax it after that. I use the easy as a backup failsafe.(i might be stupid).. But still. Ok. Il start at 0 again. Il take the infusion resin. Start with only glass(cheapedt) and see what happens. (A transparrent boat is allso cool) Il keep you updated. All advise is welcome. Allso on better layups. But adding more layers isnt gonna be an option it will be to heavy.
|
|
|
Hanaldo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 28K
|
Well now you're starting to throw in other variables that make it hard to determine what is going wrong, but in this case I would suggest you have tried to do infusion with a resin that is not suitable for infusion. Flat sheet is quite forgiving to infuse, you dont have geometry trapping air as the resin flows around it. And contrary to what you might expect, thicker layups can actually infuse easier and better than thin layups, due to the flow channels created by the fibre crimp. Thin laminates have less space for the resin to flow, so actually require a lower viscosity resin.
When things aren't working, that is when you need to become scientific and repeat the experiment with as few variables as possible, changing things can throw you off finding the solution. I can understand running out of infusion resin, but waiting for more to arrive is probably a better idea than trying to infuse with hand laminating resin and binning all that carbon/glass/consumables/time.
Release agent is not a concern here, parts are releasing so that is fine. Just a warning though, if you have waxed over the Easyleased moulds, you now need to treat that mould as a waxed mould, you can't put any more coats of Easylease on unless you strip it all off and start again. Wax on top of chemical release agent is ok, chemical release agent on top of wax is a disaster waiting to happen.
So, these last two experiments I would say are inconclusive because of the different resin used. I feel they failed because that resin didn't wet the reinforcement out properly, leading to an extremely lean resin content that explains both the poor surface finish as well as the poor interlaminar adhesion. The previous experiment failed due to bridging. And the one before that failed due to air leaks. Solve each of these issues all in the same layup without running into any other issues, and you will get a good result. Unfortunately this is the learning curve with infusion and composites in general, and at the moment the process is teaching. Its a shame school is expensive, but keep going with it and the process will deliver.
With regards to your layup and choice of reinforcements, then I would say if it works for you then it works for you and there is no reason to change that unless you want to move to pre-pregs where your choice of reinforcement is more limited to what you can buy commercially. That said, virtually what you said about needing the flexibility of the glass and the stiffness of the carbon is the misunderstanding that most people have with composites. You don't get both properties, you actually can't make a fibreglass structure stronger or stiffer by adding carbon, just like you can't make a carbon structure more flexible by adding fibreglass.
Carbon fibre has an elongation to break of about 1.5%, while fibreglass has an elongation to break of about 5%. So when your laminate takes a load, it doesn't matter if you have 100 layers of carbon fibre with 1 layer of fibreglass or 100 layers of fibreglass with 1 layer of carbon or 50 layers of each, the entire laminate can still only stretch 1.5% before the carbon breaks. The fibreglass will keep wanting to stretch to 5% before it breaks, so if your laminate cops an impact or a point loading that stretches it beyond 101.5% of its total length, then all of the carbon in that laminate is going to break, while the fibreglass is going to keep going. Once the carbon is broken it isn't doing anything for the structure, so you only have the strength of the fibreglass. So to avoid your part flying to bits entirely, it would need the fibreglass to be strong enough to carry the required loads once the carbon has broken, which makes the carbon redundant; OR it would need the carbon to be strong enough that it can carry the required loads without stretching beyond 1.5%, which then makes the fibreglass redundant. A good analogy I heard for it is it's kind of like having a piece of aluminium (your carbon) and trying to reinforce it with a rubber band (your fibreglass). If you take that structure and bend it, the rubber band will bend significantly further than the aluminium but it isn't doing anything to prevent the aluminium from bending.
There are situations where fibreglass is a superior material choice to carbon. If you have an application where you know a given laminate is going to be subject to loads that stretch it beyond 1.5%, then you have two options: make the laminate stronger by adding more layers so that it takes a higher load to achieve that elongation, which also means a heavier laminate. Or, use a material that can stretch further than 1.5% before it breaks, like fibreglass.
|
|
|
jeffrey bres
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 42,
Visits: 469
|
+xIndeed for a semi-structural part you would unlikely want a mix of the two materials for the reasons Hanaldo stated above. We have plenty of customers using DIY ovens and as long as you take electrical and thermal safety seriously, you should be able to make something that works and is not a fire hazard! Out of autoclave pre-pregs have made the pre-preg process a lot more accessible in recent years and removed a fair bit of the mystery surrounding the process. You can find our range of pre-preg videos covering various methods and our XPREG pre-preg system here: Composites Learning Area Well. I am racing rc boats over 25 years. Of witch 20 years with carbon glass and carbon cevlar etc. The best mix i know is glass with carbon in this sport. The glass its elongation is what we need. The carbon is only used to make it more stiff. Full carbon is hard like a rock 100% but when we get hit by another boat. Full carbon will break allso with a good flip(they can fly off) It are serious machines! We hit speeds of over 80mph. Im not saying we have the full benefit of all. But we take the strength from glass. And stiffnes of the carbon. Anyhow. If you know a better layup Im happy to try and test it! For this boat it needs to be light allso. I use 210 carbon 200 glass 290 glass and some coremat on the deck together with some carbon roving For the boat im trying to infuse. It went horrible again. I did a 2.5h test on the vacuum. Made a hudge batch of resin.(el2 this time.. becouse i ran out of in2.) I made a carbon plate of 4mm on a glass plate with peel on both sides... perfect bubble free. And 100% rock solid.(took me 45min to infuse with 6mm lead) The boat hull. No go. It was all white and hazy in the bag. I was even able to delaminate all layers of fabric without tearing them. I dont know what is wrong. But i didnt loose pressure in 2.5H. and did 100% the same as the carbon plate On foto it doesnt look that bad maybe. But there where 3 layers of glass inside. And now its only carbon. Gets me thinking. What if i put those parts back and vacume infuse again over them with new glass inside. Lol Will it or will it not work.    now i have a nice carbon plate and 2 carbon shells..    Im getting a little nervous, lol. Why are my vac and feed lines good. Bubble free. No leaks in 2.5 houre. Needle didnt move at all... open up the vac line and no single movement. Bag was super tight. And after infusing i have a full out problem The only thing i can think of now. Is i made these 2 boat halfs with wax over easylease. And the carbon i didnt use wax. Although. This dek i allso made with easy lease and wax. (No grlcoat) and clearcoated it.  that came out like a dream. Allso el2 resin. Vacuum allso same rolls of carbon and glass used. Same mixing cups and stirring sticks and all. Could it be my bag has some weak spots. And will start leaking on them over night? Or what am i doing so wrong? I made 2 good ones(well. Decent ones.. useble.. and now all ..... ones..
|
|
|
Chris Rogers
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 120,
Visits: 933
|
Prepreg is great but it takes WAY longer to lay up and debulk and will require more of you tooling. It's probably easier than infusion as a process though. But the material is way more trouble to get and store so it only makes sense if you need it for a good reason! It should be doable with infusion though! Bridging is a layup issue that you should be able to avoid. A shape like that should go in in several pre-patterned pieces for sure. You might look into stabilized dry surface plies like EC's Profinish. You can cut it to patterns like prepreg. I'm a nerd about this but I really think that slip joints in outside corners are very helpful - especially in the outermost ply of something like your hull. It is usually better to cut and lap a ply than to risk a bridged corner!
|
|
|
Warren (Staff)
|
|
Group: Administrators
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 8.5K
|
Indeed for a semi-structural part you would unlikely want a mix of the two materials for the reasons Hanaldo stated above. We have plenty of customers using DIY ovens and as long as you take electrical and thermal safety seriously, you should be able to make something that works and is not a fire hazard! Out of autoclave pre-pregs have made the pre-preg process a lot more accessible in recent years and removed a fair bit of the mystery surrounding the process. You can find our range of pre-preg videos covering various methods and our XPREG pre-preg system here: Composites Learning Area
Warren PenalverEasy Composites / Carbon Mods - Technical Support Assistant
|
|
|
Hanaldo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 28K
|
Glass and carbon are really a mismatch, the strength of fibreglass comes from its higher elongation to break and the strength of carbon comes from its high rigidity. If you combine the two, then the fibreglass carries all the load as the carbon will break first, which means you aren't taking advantage of the material properties of either fibre.
But yes, you can get pre-preg glass. Likely not going to be something you can get in small quantities though.
Easy Composites have virtually all the information you need in their X-Preg processing guide and YouTube tutorials. If you're new to OOA prepregs I would start there, it will really flatten the learning curve.
|
|
|
jeffrey bres
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 42,
Visits: 469
|
+x+xDon't need an autoclave for out-of-autoclave pre-preg; you need a freezer to store it in, and an oven to cure it in. Oven can be as simple or fancy as you like, mine is made from MDF and fibre cement board and cost me less than $500 including the PID controller. Has been serving me solidly for the last 7 years. Is that allso availible in glass. Or only carbon? I need a glass carbon hybrid layup. Full carbon isnt good for these things. And cevlar ive had allso. But will start to wrinkle inside the carbon. Then glass carbon. Is the best in this application. ( in my experiance.) Only now i notice... out of autoclave could be interesting. Could you tell.more.? A freezer is eazy to come by..
|
|
|
jeffrey bres
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 42,
Visits: 469
|
+xDon't need an autoclave for out-of-autoclave pre-preg; you need a freezer to store it in, and an oven to cure it in. Oven can be as simple or fancy as you like, mine is made from MDF and fibre cement board and cost me less than $500 including the PID controller. Has been serving me solidly for the last 7 years. Is that allso availible in glass. Or only carbon? I need a glass carbon hybrid layup. Full carbon isnt good for these things. And cevlar ive had allso. But will start to wrinkle inside the carbon. Then glass carbon. Is the best in this application. ( in my experiance.)
|
|
|
Hanaldo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.5K,
Visits: 28K
|
Don't need an autoclave for out-of-autoclave pre-preg; you need a freezer to store it in, and an oven to cure it in. Oven can be as simple or fancy as you like, mine is made from MDF and fibre cement board and cost me less than $500 including the PID controller. Has been serving me solidly for the last 7 years.
|
|
|
jeffrey bres
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 42,
Visits: 469
|
+xSometimes you can even throttle the feed line on a 6mm hose to slow things down. Certainly in your case it can't hurt. Bridging can be a right pain. You can use spray tacks but very sparingly otherwise they make a mess of the surface finish. You have to take care with every layer to avoid bridging as well as with the bagging stack. You can chop up the peel ply and mesh with an overlap where necessary to make it easier to avoid bridging. I allready chop the peel and mesh to avoid bridging. But yes. The white mesh that came with the kit is quite nasty in sharp corners. I did a slooow infusion with 6mm and il see what comes out. Prepreg is awsome. But then i do need an autoclave. And thats something i cant afford. So. Hand layup and infusion will be my choices. Hand layup is most used in these boats and does work fine. But infusion would be awsome when i master the tecnique.
|
|
|