|
Jeff Clemmons
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6,
Visits: 45
|
+xAlso the shipping cost for overseas is often 4x the actual cost of the easylease. Can you tell me what/ where I can buy a similar formulation stateside? If you are in the United States, go to Krayden.com. They carry a product line from Locktite of frekote mold release agents. I use frekote 700 on my aluminum molds. Dont know if it works as good as easy lease because I couldn't justify the shipping cost to find out, but everything I have read and seen its the same thing. Works excellent for me.
JC
|
|
|
|
|
cpkielycua
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 29,
Visits: 285
|
Any help from Easycomposites........?
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Broad
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 408,
Visits: 4.1K
|
I use aluminium plate. Takes EasyLease very well and the prepreg almost falls off after cooking. Also, you won't break if if you have sticky areas :-)
|
|
|
|
|
cpkielycua
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 29,
Visits: 285
|
Also the shipping cost for overseas is often 4x the actual cost of the easylease. Can you tell me what/ where I can buy a similar formulation stateside?
|
|
|
|
|
cpkielycua
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 29,
Visits: 285
|
How does one properly dispose of expired easylease?
|
|
|
|
|
oekmont
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 550,
Visits: 27K
|
Good to know. I usually bought the biggest package (5l) so far, wich can last up to 2 years. didn't have any problems so far, but maybe I should switch to the 1l size in the future, to be on the save side.
|
|
|
|
|
Matt (Staff)
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 680,
Visits: 1.9K
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xBut usually easylease should work very well. Have you cleaned the glass before applying the release agent? Maybe there is something on the glass, wich causes this issue. I really don't understand why it is not working? I cleaned the surface and even switched from tempered glass to special heat resitant glass but it does not work good enough to be called a repetitive process. The reason could be hidden in: - Glass Type - Epoxy System (in my case E320/E321/E322/E323 from SGL) - Heat Control (In my case according to Sigrapreg datasheet) - Application method - Application quantity - Panel stiffness This is what I did so far: - Varied glass type (from tempered to heat resistant glass) - Varied application method (Circular movments to linear movments) - Application method (more and less release agent) - I tried with a Mylar foil between the glass and the carbon and it worked - Changed stiffness of the panel What I noticed was, that it worked with stiffer panels like [0/90/+45/-45/+45/-45/90/0] or unidirectional 0° with a 2mm thickness. Therefore my question: - Could it be that the stiffness of the sheet influences the release of the sheet itself? Next I will try with the HP-HGR5 release agent... Hi Matt, thank you for commenting on this. Here are the answers to your questions: - I use the Sigrapreg C U200-0/NF-E322/40% Prepreg system from the SGL Group. - My cure cycle is considering the Sigrapreg Epoxy System Specification and is as follows: 40min ramp to 100°C/120min at 100°C/40min ramp down to 20°. My comments concerning your points: 1) Could be. This is the reason for which I tried with another glass that unfortunately failed as well. I guess I have to talk to a glass specialist here... 2) The release agent was always properly sealed but it is 2 years old. Are two years considered to as old? 3) This can be excluded because I checked it 4) I tried different procedures but no one worked to be considered a reliable repetitive process 5) This is very unlikely since I know the fiber and matrix system and have it documented in the specifications Looking forward to hear from you... Thank you Matt, this gives me another lever to pull for another test round tomorrow. I will post the results... Concerning the thickness, I can see that the epoxy flowed nicely and gave me a good surface finish. Non the less, there are some dry fibers not covered by the epoxy. You can see this in the pictures. I also have to mention that the Prepreg is expired for a year now. So that might be another reason, although I still get good results and the Prepreg was stored at -25 °C. No problem; if the resin has flowed properly then it's less likely to be the prepreg itself or the thickness but still a consideration. I look forward to hearing how you go. So I was able to repeat the test with the Easy-Lease release agent and I got a perfect release from the glass. The Easy-Lease I used here, was newer and has a label that says 2017. The one I used before has a label with the date 2015 and was at least 2 years old. I learned it the hard way. "Never use Easy-Lease that is older then a year", was a nice lesson for me. Thank you Matt, I was not aware that the exspiration date of the Easy-Lease has to be taken that serious. On other products the expiration date is kind of fuzzier but I will certainly respect that one from now on. Kind regards Hi Pier, thank you for the feedback. I'm glad we have got to the bottom of your problems. There is some 'fuzziness' around the expiry date of the release agent and, as you've found, what happens is that its performance deteriorates (rather than stopping working completely) which is why you got mixed results working with the expired product and perfect results with the fresh product. Nonetheless, it's certainly a product where respect should be paid to its shelf life.
|
|
|
|
|
Pier
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11,
Visits: 22
|
+x+x+x+x+xBut usually easylease should work very well. Have you cleaned the glass before applying the release agent? Maybe there is something on the glass, wich causes this issue. I really don't understand why it is not working? I cleaned the surface and even switched from tempered glass to special heat resitant glass but it does not work good enough to be called a repetitive process. The reason could be hidden in: - Glass Type - Epoxy System (in my case E320/E321/E322/E323 from SGL) - Heat Control (In my case according to Sigrapreg datasheet) - Application method - Application quantity - Panel stiffness This is what I did so far: - Varied glass type (from tempered to heat resistant glass) - Varied application method (Circular movments to linear movments) - Application method (more and less release agent) - I tried with a Mylar foil between the glass and the carbon and it worked - Changed stiffness of the panel What I noticed was, that it worked with stiffer panels like [0/90/+45/-45/+45/-45/90/0] or unidirectional 0° with a 2mm thickness. Therefore my question: - Could it be that the stiffness of the sheet influences the release of the sheet itself? Next I will try with the HP-HGR5 release agent... Hi Matt, thank you for commenting on this. Here are the answers to your questions: - I use the Sigrapreg C U200-0/NF-E322/40% Prepreg system from the SGL Group. - My cure cycle is considering the Sigrapreg Epoxy System Specification and is as follows: 40min ramp to 100°C/120min at 100°C/40min ramp down to 20°. My comments concerning your points: 1) Could be. This is the reason for which I tried with another glass that unfortunately failed as well. I guess I have to talk to a glass specialist here... 2) The release agent was always properly sealed but it is 2 years old. Are two years considered to as old? 3) This can be excluded because I checked it 4) I tried different procedures but no one worked to be considered a reliable repetitive process 5) This is very unlikely since I know the fiber and matrix system and have it documented in the specifications Looking forward to hear from you... Thank you Matt, this gives me another lever to pull for another test round tomorrow. I will post the results... Concerning the thickness, I can see that the epoxy flowed nicely and gave me a good surface finish. Non the less, there are some dry fibers not covered by the epoxy. You can see this in the pictures. I also have to mention that the Prepreg is expired for a year now. So that might be another reason, although I still get good results and the Prepreg was stored at -25 °C. No problem; if the resin has flowed properly then it's less likely to be the prepreg itself or the thickness but still a consideration. I look forward to hearing how you go. So I was able to repeat the test with the Easy-Lease release agent and I got a perfect release from the glass. The Easy-Lease I used here, was newer and has a label that says 2017. The one I used before has a label with the date 2015 and was at least 2 years old. I learned it the hard way. "Never use Easy-Lease that is older then a year", was a nice lesson for me. Thank you Matt, I was not aware that the exspiration date of the Easy-Lease has to be taken that serious. On other products the expiration date is kind of fuzzier but I will certainly respect that one from now on. Kind regards
|
|
|
|
|
Matt (Staff)
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 680,
Visits: 1.9K
|
+x+x+x+xBut usually easylease should work very well. Have you cleaned the glass before applying the release agent? Maybe there is something on the glass, wich causes this issue. I really don't understand why it is not working? I cleaned the surface and even switched from tempered glass to special heat resitant glass but it does not work good enough to be called a repetitive process. The reason could be hidden in: - Glass Type - Epoxy System (in my case E320/E321/E322/E323 from SGL) - Heat Control (In my case according to Sigrapreg datasheet) - Application method - Application quantity - Panel stiffness This is what I did so far: - Varied glass type (from tempered to heat resistant glass) - Varied application method (Circular movments to linear movments) - Application method (more and less release agent) - I tried with a Mylar foil between the glass and the carbon and it worked - Changed stiffness of the panel What I noticed was, that it worked with stiffer panels like [0/90/+45/-45/+45/-45/90/0] or unidirectional 0° with a 2mm thickness. Therefore my question: - Could it be that the stiffness of the sheet influences the release of the sheet itself? Next I will try with the HP-HGR5 release agent... Hi Matt, thank you for commenting on this. Here are the answers to your questions: - I use the Sigrapreg C U200-0/NF-E322/40% Prepreg system from the SGL Group. - My cure cycle is considering the Sigrapreg Epoxy System Specification and is as follows: 40min ramp to 100°C/120min at 100°C/40min ramp down to 20°. My comments concerning your points: 1) Could be. This is the reason for which I tried with another glass that unfortunately failed as well. I guess I have to talk to a glass specialist here... 2) The release agent was always properly sealed but it is 2 years old. Are two years considered to as old? 3) This can be excluded because I checked it 4) I tried different procedures but no one worked to be considered a reliable repetitive process 5) This is very unlikely since I know the fiber and matrix system and have it documented in the specifications Looking forward to hear from you... Thank you Matt, this gives me another lever to pull for another test round tomorrow. I will post the results... Concerning the thickness, I can see that the epoxy flowed nicely and gave me a good surface finish. Non the less, there are some dry fibers not covered by the epoxy. You can see this in the pictures. I also have to mention that the Prepreg is expired for a year now. So that might be another reason, although I still get good results and the Prepreg was stored at -25 °C. No problem; if the resin has flowed properly then it's less likely to be the prepreg itself or the thickness but still a consideration. I look forward to hearing how you go.
|
|
|
|
|
Pier
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11,
Visits: 22
|
+x+x+xBut usually easylease should work very well. Have you cleaned the glass before applying the release agent? Maybe there is something on the glass, wich causes this issue. I really don't understand why it is not working? I cleaned the surface and even switched from tempered glass to special heat resitant glass but it does not work good enough to be called a repetitive process. The reason could be hidden in: - Glass Type - Epoxy System (in my case E320/E321/E322/E323 from SGL) - Heat Control (In my case according to Sigrapreg datasheet) - Application method - Application quantity - Panel stiffness This is what I did so far: - Varied glass type (from tempered to heat resistant glass) - Varied application method (Circular movments to linear movments) - Application method (more and less release agent) - I tried with a Mylar foil between the glass and the carbon and it worked - Changed stiffness of the panel What I noticed was, that it worked with stiffer panels like [0/90/+45/-45/+45/-45/90/0] or unidirectional 0° with a 2mm thickness. Therefore my question: - Could it be that the stiffness of the sheet influences the release of the sheet itself? Next I will try with the HP-HGR5 release agent... Hi Matt, thank you for commenting on this. Here are the answers to your questions: - I use the Sigrapreg C U200-0/NF-E322/40% Prepreg system from the SGL Group. - My cure cycle is considering the Sigrapreg Epoxy System Specification and is as follows: 40min ramp to 100°C/120min at 100°C/40min ramp down to 20°. My comments concerning your points: 1) Could be. This is the reason for which I tried with another glass that unfortunately failed as well. I guess I have to talk to a glass specialist here... 2) The release agent was always properly sealed but it is 2 years old. Are two years considered to as old? 3) This can be excluded because I checked it 4) I tried different procedures but no one worked to be considered a reliable repetitive process 5) This is very unlikely since I know the fiber and matrix system and have it documented in the specifications Looking forward to hear from you... Thank you Matt, this gives me another lever to pull for another test round tomorrow. I will post the results... Concerning the thickness, I can see that the epoxy flowed nicely and gave me a good surface finish. Non the less, there are some dry fibers not covered by the epoxy. You can see this in the pictures. I also have to mention that the Prepreg is expired for a year now. So that might be another reason, although I still get good results and the Prepreg was stored at -25 °C.
|
|
|
|