Group: Forum Members
Posts: 592,
Visits: 1.9K
|
I agree with ChrisR... Diolene is a better option for the bottom layer, from a cost/benefit perspective. (and cutting/trimming the edges.)
I did not have problems with print through of the core material in my mudguards, but doing a fully cured infusion, and then adding a core + cover layer will get around that problem for sure.
The first batch of my 18" mudgards were made with no gelcoat, as they were meant to be painted and clearcoated anyway, they were infused directly, i one go, 3 layers of CF + core strips..
I cut/chamfered the edge of the soric with a scalpel-blade at a shallow angle for the front mudguard, but not for the rear which has a sharper radius on the edge. At the time I did not notice any print through on any of the mudguards.
The next set will be made with EC Pro-finish and a "V-pattern" down the middle, and translucent green clearcoat ... I think I will infuse without the core and then add it afterwards, just to make sure not to get print-through.
"Sapere Aude"... Dare to KNOW!
The written word is the only truly efficient vehicle for transmitting a complex concept from mind to mind...
103% of all people do not understand statistics...
Do not adjust our mind, theres a fault in reality :-)
|