RTM Vs RIM for manufacturing of thermal protection system for a honeycomb core (attenuators)?


RTM Vs RIM for manufacturing of thermal protection system for a honeycomb core (attenuators)?
Author
Message
Kasim Salih
Kasim Salih
Junior Member (4 reputation)Junior Member (4 reputation)Junior Member (4 reputation)Junior Member (4 reputation)Junior Member (4 reputation)Junior Member (4 reputation)Junior Member (4 reputation)Junior Member (4 reputation)Junior Member (4 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1, Visits: 2
The honeycomb core structure used for attenuating loud noises is subjected to high temperature ( up to 315 C), and I am trying to figure out which method of manufacturing to use. I have not decided which material to use yet for protecting the honeycomb core structure from the high heat, but I would like to know whether Resin Infusion Molding (RIM) is better than Resin Transfer Molding? Independent of the material chosen, I want to know if RTM presents a low cost manufacturing solution?  What the advantages and disadvantages of RIM and RTM are? Is RIM more or less practical than RTM for a part of this nature (thermal protection system for the honey comb acoustic wall?  Is RIM complexity affected by the choice of material? Can either of these processes be used successfully with a honeycomb core (attenuator)? What are the challenges?
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Similar Topics

Reading This Topic

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search