Is CF always "the answer"


Author
Message
steveastroUK
steveastroUK
Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21, Visits: 78
A heretical statement, but I was wondering when CF ISN'T the answer ? If I have a structural design which is STIFFNESS driven, like a wing or telescope, rather than strength driven, is CF "better".

I've been studying the concept of specific modulus, or stiffness-to-weight ratio and ended up in a confusion of different design approaches related to the telescope project I mentioned last week.

Steve
Reply
steveastroUK
steveastroUK
Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)Supreme Being (211 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21, Visits: 78
Warren (18/08/2012)

When you take into account cost and sometimes ease of manufacture, it is clear that carbon may not be the best choice overall, even if it is structurally superior to the alternatives.



Yes, well that's obvious, but I'm asking more from the structural engineering perspective.

Steve
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Similar Topics

Reading This Topic

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search