flexural strength test of honeycomb sandwich panel as per ASTM standards


flexural strength test of honeycomb sandwich panel as per ASTM standards
Author
Message
mosoqa
mosoqa
Forum Member (42 reputation)Forum Member (42 reputation)Forum Member (42 reputation)Forum Member (42 reputation)Forum Member (42 reputation)Forum Member (42 reputation)Forum Member (42 reputation)Forum Member (42 reputation)Forum Member (42 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6, Visits: 20
Hello,

i need to to determine the sandwich panel flexural strength and stiffness following ASTM C393 which is updated to ASTM D 7250.

The face sheet is of carbon fiber(phenolic resin) and core of Aluminium AL5056.the strength values for the Aluminum is quoted in the manufacturer's literature(coupon test results).

i am looking for guidelines for selection of specimen dimensions and loading configuration and most importantly the guidelines on the test fixture setup with recommended geometries and specifications(material of load application apparatus,load span,recommended geometry and material of reaction supports etc).

thank you,

regards,      
fgayford
fgayford
Supreme Being (3.6K reputation)Supreme Being (3.6K reputation)Supreme Being (3.6K reputation)Supreme Being (3.6K reputation)Supreme Being (3.6K reputation)Supreme Being (3.6K reputation)Supreme Being (3.6K reputation)Supreme Being (3.6K reputation)Supreme Being (3.6K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 433, Visits: 1.2K
This all sounds very impressive, but.
Perhaps if you explained it to us as if you were talking to a child some of us would actually understand what you are talking about.
Fred
f1rob
f1rob
Supreme Being (2K reputation)Supreme Being (2K reputation)Supreme Being (2K reputation)Supreme Being (2K reputation)Supreme Being (2K reputation)Supreme Being (2K reputation)Supreme Being (2K reputation)Supreme Being (2K reputation)Supreme Being (2K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 237, Visits: 4.8K
Are you making a new product or a improved composite version of a current item ?

If your doing a improved version do like for like test,an take your baseline figure from the original item
erdemy1
erdemy1
Supreme Being (133 reputation)Supreme Being (133 reputation)Supreme Being (133 reputation)Supreme Being (133 reputation)Supreme Being (133 reputation)Supreme Being (133 reputation)Supreme Being (133 reputation)Supreme Being (133 reputation)Supreme Being (133 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11, Visits: 225
You should read standarts very carefully, these standarts are not give directly specimen dimensions. This links will help u

http://www.wyomingtestfixtures.com/Products/d2.html
SeanS
SeanS
Forum Member (37 reputation)Forum Member (37 reputation)Forum Member (37 reputation)Forum Member (37 reputation)Forum Member (37 reputation)Forum Member (37 reputation)Forum Member (37 reputation)Forum Member (37 reputation)Forum Member (37 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5, Visits: 83
I havent done any testing in a long time so am rusty, but to some extent it depends on what type of failure you're expecting. For example, if using skins that have fibres 90 degrees to the length, then skin failure could occur quickly as they become indented. Also depends on things like density of your alu core. 
The first flexural tests I did was about 30mm width, (something like 80mm span from memory) which was too thin to get a proper consistency with full cell volume/unit area, so the bigger your cells, the wider you make it. Also, you'll want a good 20mm radius if you can on the loaders for realy flexural tests but if you are trying to simulate more point like loads, this could be reduced - really depends what you're trying to get out of it.
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Similar Topics

Reading This Topic

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search