Chainstay repair Questions


Chainstay repair Questions
View
Options
Author
Message
cookeaa
cookeaa
cookeaa
posted 11 Years Ago HOT
Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7, Visits: 58
I have a cracked, Triangular cross-section, Chainstay on a road bike which I'm looking at repairing at the moment. 

I have Rubbed down the tube and looking at it I have a transverse crack going most of the way through two of the three sides of the profile, my original plan was to remove the material around the cracks, leaving the one original back wall still intact and then infill the tube profile, possibly with a sleeve of some sort, to provide support and then over-wrap the section to reinforce it and transfer loads across the damaged area. 

however I've watched a few different youtube repair videos/read a couple of "how to's" and seen some people simply 'fix' a cracked area from the outside of the tube with a thickened gelcoat type epoxy and then just over-wrap the area... 
My instinct is that this isn't the way to do things, that your not really binding the fibres al lthe way through the crack, and that further de-lamination could occur without you really knowing about it, but it is tempting as it requires no significant removal of the original material and is quicker and easier... am I being a bit too cautious?

My other question is on layup for the repair, being a seat stay its subject to cyclical loading in a few different axis'. 
I have 200g UD and 200g 90/90* Plain Weave (PW) fabrics to choose from. 
My initial (rather lazy) plan was to simply use the PW at 45* to the tube axis and wrap that 5 or 6 times in a single go, but reading about further I think I might be wiser to use a combination of the PW fabric and UD to try and better align fibres to possible load paths so I have several possible configurations under consideration now: 

Config 1 (7 layers):

1-PW @ 0*
2-UD @ +30*
3-UD @ -30*
4-UD @ 0*
5-UD @ +45*
6-UD @ -45*
7-PW @ 0*

Config 2 (5 layers):

1-UD @ 0*
2-UD @ +30*
3-UD @ -30*
4-PW @ 45*
5-PW @ 0*

Config 3 (4 layers):

1-PW @ 45*
2-UD @ +30* 
3-UD @ -30*
4-PW @ 0*

Config 4 (4 layers):

1-PW @ 45*
2-PW @ +30* (-60*?)
3-PW @ -30* (+60*?)
4-PW @ 0*

Ideally I don't want the repair to be too bulky, just from an aesthetic point of view, its not critical, but it would be nice if repair looked "minimal" when finished... I'm also keen to keep the ride of the frame comfortable so I'm thinking too much added material (especially aligned with the tube @ 0*) might make for a harsher ride?

Config 1 is a bit of a belt and braces approach, lots of layers, possibly too many @ 0* but I'd maybe be more confident in it, Config 2 is paired down from that a bit and Config 3 and 4 are intended as much more 'minimalist' options, based on the assumption that the repair doesn't need lots of extra material as the extant tube will still be taking a fair bit of the load already and that only one layer addressing each axis would be sufficient... 

Sorry for the rambling post, but this isn't something I've dealt with before... Any advice/input?

Thanks in advance. 
Reply Like 4
Replies
cookeaa
cookeaa
cookeaa
posted 11 Years Ago HOT
Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)Forum Guru (61 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7, Visits: 58
Cheers for that, 

So there's no real need to align any layers to 45* or 90*? 
Reply Like 4
progetto
progetto
progetto
posted 11 Years Ago HOT
Forum Member (44 reputation)Forum Member (44 reputation)Forum Member (44 reputation)Forum Member (44 reputation)Forum Member (44 reputation)Forum Member (44 reputation)Forum Member (44 reputation)Forum Member (44 reputation)Forum Member (44 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6, Visits: 231
No, I've built bikes with chain stays with layup similar ( nothing greater than 30*), they are designed just fine. The rear end is triangulated when the wheel is attached so most of the twisting force is nearer the bottom bracket.
Reply Like 4
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...



Submit

Threaded View
Threaded View
Chainstay repair Questions
cookeaa - 11 Years Ago
     5 layers of 200gsm will give you a solid enough repair. Scarf back damaged tube, I have filled with...
progetto - 11 Years Ago
     Cheers for that, So there's no real need to align any layers to 45* or 90*?
cookeaa - 11 Years Ago
             No, I've built bikes with chain stays with layup similar ( nothing greater than 30*), they are...
progetto - 11 Years Ago
     Just realized I typed Chainstay throughout my first post when I meant Seat Stay... But I assume...
cookeaa - 11 Years Ago
             Yes, much the same only a lot less loading except at the brake bridge. The wall thickness on modern...
progetto - 11 Years Ago
     I weighed it before I started, 1092g bare, I didn't actually crash it, I bought it as a repair...
cookeaa - 11 Years Ago

Similar Topics

Post Quoted Reply
Reading This Topic

Powered by InstantForum 2017-0 Final © 2025
Execution: 0.000. 2 queries. Compression Enabled.
Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search