Using thin honeycomb panels as skins in a very thick honeycomb panel


Using thin honeycomb panels as skins in a very thick honeycomb panel
Author
Message
konaMike
k
Supreme Being (82 reputation)Supreme Being (82 reputation)Supreme Being (82 reputation)Supreme Being (82 reputation)Supreme Being (82 reputation)Supreme Being (82 reputation)Supreme Being (82 reputation)Supreme Being (82 reputation)Supreme Being (82 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9, Visits: 27
Hi fellow members,

I am building a structural rectangular carbon box beam 2.5” thick x 6.0” wide and 60” long. The structural objective is to equally maximize the specific bending (in both the vertical and horizontal axis) and torsional stiffness of the beam using no more than 800 grams of cured material. In the application for the beam there are no significant point loads and load distribution can be considered to be uniform across the entire surface of the object . Other factors such as the ultimate strength, fatigue strength, surface finish, layup, sourcing material, etc can be ignored for the purposes of this inquiry. At this point in the process I am only concerned with identifying the form that will produce the stiffest and lightest beam. As my background is more in the area of materials engineering, I am seeking the advice of forum members with structural experience. Having said that, my sense is a closed edge sandwich panel with uni-carbon faceplates and a carbon honeycomb core may be the best approach to achieve this objective. Would anyone disagree or suggest another approach?

Also, if a sandwich panel construction is the best approach, owing to the 2.5” thickness of the panel, I am having doubts about whether the standard “thin face sheet” sandwich panel construction will produce the lifghtest and stiffest result as opposed to a “double sandwich” design in which the face sheets of the main panel are also sandwich (perhaps with nomex core) panels albeit very thin - say 0.25” thick. My theory is that since “face panels” will be 10x stiffer thin face skins and only marginally heavier, this approach will allow the cell size of the main 2.5” thick panel core to be much larger and therefore much lighter. For the 2.5” core I am considering using “end-grain” pre-cured laminate sheet so my second question is whether the cell shape should be a hexagon. My sense is that a set of circular cells (short tubes) bonded to adjacent cells along their tangents would be lighter, have better bucking strength and provide superior shear transfer?

Thanks in advance for your consideration and assistance.

GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View
Threaded View
konaMike - 5 Years Ago
torstenker - 5 Years Ago
konaMike - 5 Years Ago
torstenker - 5 Years Ago
konaMike - 5 Years Ago
torstenker - 5 Years Ago
SleepingAwake - 5 Years Ago
konaMike - 5 Years Ago
f1rob - 5 Years Ago
konaMike - 5 Years Ago
SleepingAwake - 5 Years Ago
Rosta Spicl - 5 Years Ago
SleepingAwake - 5 Years Ago
Rosta Spicl - 5 Years Ago
konaMike - 5 Years Ago

Similar Topics

Reading This Topic

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search